Exploring the relationship between policing policy preferences and generational voter turnout during the 2020 election

This study investigates the effect of generational cohort status and support for policing policy preferences on voter turnout during the 2020 election year. Amid heightened visibility of police violence following high-profile incidents and substantial public mobilizations, there is a marked generational divergence in political engagement, particularly influenced by attitudes toward policing policies.

Despite the relevance of these issues, there is a significant gap in understanding how specific policing policy preferences shape voter turnout across generations. This hampers the ability of elected officials, government workers, and policymakers to engage effectively different generational cohorts in the electoral process based on their unique experiences and perspectives on law enforcement. This study aims to address this deficiency by exploring how generational differences in police preferences influence voting behavior.

Findings from this paper suggest that policing policies resonate somewhat differently across generations, with the overall impact on voter turnout limited, indicating the possible need for broader electoral strategies that transcend generational divides. The consistent although moderate effect sizes observed for increased Millennial turnout for liberal policing preferences across almost all tested policing policies suggests that generational-specific approaches to voter mobilization based on these issues may yield improvements in turnout. This takeaway is further substantiated by observable although less consistent responsiveness by older generations, specifically the Silent generation, which experience an opposite effect of decreased voter turnout when individuals hold more liberal policy preferences.

Related Posts

  |  

This working paper examines the relationship between state-level implementation of Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) policies and the voting turnout of young voters (aged 18-24) in United States elections, primarily analyzing...
CNBC, July 2024 The issues of age and candidate vitality are having an impact on the 2024 election. Lawmakers in the U.S. are relatively old when compared to similar legislative...
Berkeley News, June 2024 Millennials and Gen Z face risks unknown to any previous generation. The Berkeley Institute for Young Americans reports that, on the left, center and right, these...
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to share results from a survey that leveraged Cultural Theory to understand the relationship between generational values and political participation in recent U.S....
Abstract Evidence has been accumulating for years that Millennials and Gen Zers are coming of age in the 21st century with unique attitudes and outlooks that differ from older age...
Working Paper Series: In this mixed methods research project, we aim to understand how the Millennial and Gen Z generations are reacting to new risks that have evolved in American...
On average, presidential approval across generations is the lowest it has been in over a decade. Using cumulative data from the Cooperative Election Study (CES) we estimate retrospective evaluations of...
KQED Political Breakdown, April 2024 As part of KQED’s Youth Takeover, we hear from young voters about the issues they care about most ahead of a presidential election. From the war...
With the economic downturn associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, optimism on the economy is the lowest it has been since the 2008 financial crisis. Using cumulative data from the Cooperative...
2024 Election Vibe Check: Interviews with the Next Generation of Leaders in American Politics To better explore the state of youth voices in American politics as we enter the 2024...

We envision a new paradigm in public policy that advances an equitable, sustainable, and prosperous society for current and future generations.

© Copyright 2024 University of California, Berkeley