Predicting 17-Year-Old Turnout in California if the Voting Age Were Lowered

Read the full policy brief, which reviews the research evidence for lowering the voting age, California’s historical context, and predicted turnout rates for 17-year-olds.

Using data from the Cooperative Election Study (CCES) and the Current Population Survey (CPS), we estimate how many 17-year-olds would have voted in 2018 and 2020 if they were eligible to vote.

We find that:

  • 2018 Midterms – If the voting age were lowered to 17, our point estimates show that between 20-27 percent of all 17-year-olds in California would have participated in the 2018 midterm election;
  • 2020 General Election – Between 26-46 percent of all 17-year-olds would have participated in the 2020 general election (with additional uncertainty within the estimated 95% confidence intervals).

Our predictions show that 17-year-olds would have the lowest turnout rate of any age group, but our estimates do not account for exogenous factors such as the popularity of an election, whether high-quality civics education is offered to 17-year-olds, the novelty of the voting age change and its effect on turnout, or other factors.

Related Posts

This working paper examines the relationship between state-level implementation of Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) policies and the voting turnout of young voters (aged 18-24) in United States elections, primarily analyzing...
The social unrest of the 2020 election year was a historic flashpoint in the visibility of police violence. Successive nationally publicized police killings of Black citizens—from the murder of Breona...
CNBC, July 2024 The issues of age and candidate vitality are having an impact on the 2024 election. Lawmakers in the U.S. are relatively old when compared to similar legislative...
Berkeley News, June 2024 Millennials and Gen Z face risks unknown to any previous generation. The Berkeley Institute for Young Americans reports that, on the left, center and right, these...