Racial Diversity and Exclusionary Zoning: Evidence from the Great Migration

Summary

Why do cities adopt and maintain laws that restrict land use, creating a shortage of affordable housing? Dominant explanations emphasize the economic incentives of homeowners to preserve their property values. The origins and racially disparate impacts of these laws suggest another motivating factor: the desire to maintain and further racial segregation by white residents. I characterize for the first time the extent of exclusionary zoning in the United States: across over 100 of the largest cities in the country, the median city allows multi-family housing to be built on only 12% of residential land. Then, leveraging exogenous factors for Black migration to Northern cities from 1940 to 1970, I show that increasing racial diversity causes cities to zone less land for multi-family housing. Analysis of public opinion surveys during this time period shows the Great Migration caused a racial backlash among urban white voters, which translated to policy action. This evidence suggests that exclusionary zoning was adopted to maintain racial segregation and that opposition to multi-family housing cannot just be explained by desire to maintain property values. I rule out alternative explanations of increased homeownership rates, different city institutions, or differences in federal intervention driving variation in zoning. These findings show how racial threat can be channeled into racialized public policy and provide a new explanation for inequality in housing markets today.

Related Posts

  |  

Code, publicly-available data, and figures for this post are available on this Github repository. California faces a housing crisis. The severity of this crisis is apparent in a number of...
Code, publicly-available data, and figures for this post are available on this Github repository. Significant effort in the social sciences is spent on properly measuring economic well-being. Statistics covering income...
On the blog this month we’re looking at trends in generational homeownership rates, by the age of each generation, with generation defined based on the Pew Research Center’s definition. The...
Executive Summary Proposition 13 plays an outsized role in the history of public finance in California and is a central feature of property ownership in the state. Despite its importance,...
The Zillow Transaction and Assessment Dataset (ZTRAX) is a comprehensive, national real estate database made available free of charge to U.S. academic, nonprofit and government researchers. ZTRAX is largely made...

  |  

The impacts of rising housing costs are particularly salient among young people in California. Young adults, especially Millennials, are more likely to rent and less likely to own a home...
Using Census data, BIFYA estimates that essentially all age groups between 21 and 65 are less likely to own a home in 2019 than in 1980. The trend is most pronounced for...

  |  

Across California, nearly half of people are rent burdened with annual rents exceeding 40 percent of their post-tax income. The picture is bleaker for young people, who are disproportionately impacted...
Panelists Larry Brooks, Director of Operations, Alameda County Health Homes Leslie Dubbin, Assistant Professor, Social Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing at UCSF Felicia Scruggs-Wright, Director of Property Management, East Bay...
Panelists Srinidhi Sampath Kumar, Sustainable Housing Program Manager, California Housing Partnership Steven Weissman, Lecturer, Goldman School of Public Policy, and Founder and Former Director of the Energy Program at Berkeley...

We envision a new paradigm in public policy that advances an equitable, sustainable, and prosperous society for current and future generations.

© Copyright 2024 University of California, Berkeley